Nl-Fr

View abstract

This abstract is assigned to session Free Papers : Posters on Display - Series 101-1..
Presentation preference Oral presentation
TitleComparative evaluation of response to Dexamethasone and Flucinolone acetonide intravitreal implants in patients with uveitic macular edema.
Accept poster if oral is not possible ?Yes
PurposeTo compare the response to treatment in patients who received intravitreal dexamethasone implants versus intravitreal Flucinolone implants for the management of uveitic macular edema.
MethodsThis is a retrospective study of patients who had attended the uveitis clinic and had received intravitreal dexamethasone or Flucinolone implants. The data of 40 patients was collected in each group. Patients who did not have any macular edema at baseline were excluded. Patients were grouped according to baseline central macular thickness (CMT), and the average of peak response and peak intraocular pressure (IOP) in each of the groups was compared between the two drug implants.
ResultsThe mean reduction in CMT in patients with baseline CMT <300microns was 16.66 microns in the dexamethasone group and 16.41microns in the Flucinolone group overall, irrespective of previous steroid treatment. Primary implant of Flucinolone did not show a significant improvement in this group. For patients with CMT >500microns, the mean reduction in macular thickness was 329.75microns in dexamethasone group, 211microns in Flucinolone group, and 315 microns in primary Flucinolone group. The reduction in other groups was also comparable.
Patients who had received primary Flucinolone implant showed response comparable to those that received Ozurdex implant. There was no significant difference in IOP increase between the two drugs across all groups (3.72 mmHg in Dexamethasone group Vs 2.94 mmHg in Flucinolone group) .
ConclusionFlucinolone is an effective option as an initial implant in eyes with uveitic macular edema, with no increase in complications when compared to dexamethasone.
Conflict of interestNo
1
Last nameKHANAM
Initials of first name(s)S
DepartmentOphthalmology
CityLeicester
CountryUnited Kingdom
2
Last nameKumar
Initials of first name(s)P
DepartmentOphthalmology
CityLeicester
CountryUnited Kingdom
3
Last nameParida
Initials of first name(s)S
DepartmentOphthalmology
CityLeicester
CountryUnited Kingdom
4
Last nameKapoor
Initials of first name(s)B
DepartmentOphthalmology
CityLeicester
CountryUnited Kingdom