Nl-Fr

View abstract

This abstract is assigned to session Poster Session - On Display Posters nr 200 ... 299
Presentation preference Poster presentation
TitleLOW-VOLUME MULTIPLEX PCR FOR ETIOLOGICAL DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTIOUS UVEITIS
PurposeTo analyse the usefulness of low-volume direct multiplex PCR of intraocular fluid for the etiological diagnosis of uveitis.
MethodsSamples (aqueous humor, n=33; vitreous humor, n=2) from 35 patients with active uveitis (≥2+ cells in anterior chamber (AC)) (July,21 to Sept,22). 20µl of sample was analysed using a direct multiplex qualitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay (Nihon Techno Service Co, Japan, for research purpose) including herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 and 2; varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), human herpes virus 6 (HHV6), human T-lymphotropic virus, Treponema pallidum and Toxoplasma gondii).
ResultsUveitis were anterior, intermediate, posterior and panuveitis in 16 (45.7%), 1 (2.8%), 15 (42.8%) and 3 (8.7%) patients, respectively. Overall positivity was 25.7% (9/35 samples); among acute uveitis was 34.8% (8/23 samples); among infectious uveitis (clinical diagnosis) was 39.1% (9/23 samples). Herpes virus was detected in 4 samples: 2 for HHV6 (anterior uveitis), 1 for HSV2 (acute retinal necrosis) and 1 for EBV (neuroretinitis); T. gondii was detected in 4 samples (chorioretinitis) and T. pallidum in another sample (diffuse uveitis). The strip PCR changed the etiological diagnosis in two cases (5.7%; herpetic uveitis or syphilis to toxoplasmosis) and showed a unexpected herpesvirus as causative agent in another two cases. All 12 non-infectious uveitis samples were negative.
ConclusionFor uveitis etiological diagnosis, direct strip PCR was able to demonstrate the infectious agent in one third of our sample with the unique characteristics of using very small sample volume, of testing for multiple pathogens all together and for a rapid results.
Conflict of interestNo
Authors 1
Last nameYAMAMOTO
Initials of first name(s)JH
DepartmentOphthalmology, LIM 33, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 2
Last nameFerracioli-Oda
Initials of first name(s)E
DepartmentOphthalmology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 3
Last nameGouveia
Initials of first name(s)MGS
DepartmentClinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Laboratory, LIM 07, FMUSP
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 4
Last namePinho
Initials of first name(s)JR
DepartmentClinical and Experimental Gastroenterology Laboratory, LIM 07, FMUSP
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 5
Last nameTanaka
Initials of first name(s)T
DepartmentOphthalmology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 6
Last nameCoelho
Initials of first name(s)V
DepartmentLaboratory of Immunology, Heart Institute, FMUSP
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil
Authors 7
Last nameBispo
Initials of first name(s)PJ
DepartmentOphthalmology, Harvard Medical School
CityBoston
CountryUnited States
Authors 8
Last nameHirata
Initials of first name(s)CE
DepartmentOphthalmology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Sao Paulo
CitySao Paulo
CountryBrazil